Recurrent erysipelas: Predisposing factors and costs of prophylaxis

Clicks: 245
ID: 119767
1970
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #11 of 14 articles by views in Infection

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
After an average follow-up time of three years, recurrent erysipelas was observed in 29% of 143 patients admitted primarily with erysipelas. Nineteen patients (13%) had two or more recurrences during this period. The predisposing factor with the highest recurrence rate was venous insufficiency. Regular prophylaxis with phenoxymethylpenicillin (or erythromycin in penicillin allergics) after the second recurrence may be cost-effective. This antibiotic prophylaxis is only recommended in patients with predisposing factors who have suffered severe attacks.
Reference Key
jorup-rönström1970infectionrecurrent Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Christina Jorup-Rönström;S. Britton;Christina Jorup-Rönström;S. Britton;
Journal Infection
Year 1970
DOI
doi:10.1007/BF01650206
URL
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01650206
Keywords
internal medicine infectious diseases general practice / family medicine

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.