Airborne or Droplet Precautions for Health Workers Treating Coronavirus Disease 2019?
Clicks: 149
ID: 119615
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
149 views
15 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #155 of 430 articles by views in The Journal of infectious diseases
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 430 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
At present, the limited available evidence does not support droplet precautions and 1- to 2-meter (≈3–6 feet) rule of special separation being adequate for occu
Abstract Quality Issue:
This abstract appears to be incomplete or contains metadata (24 words).
Try re-searching for a better abstract.
| Reference Key |
prateektheairborne
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Bahl, Prateek;Doolan, Con;de Silva, Charitha;Chughtai, Abrar Ahmad;Bourouiba, Lydia;MacIntyre, C Raina; |
| Journal | The Journal of infectious diseases |
| Year | Year not found |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
|
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.