The use of research measures in adult clinical practice
Clicks: 189
ID: 119466
2011
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
189 views
25 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #6 of 7 articles by views in innovations in clinical neuroscience
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Many psychopathology research assessment tools can be used easily and productively in clinical practice. We conducted a workshop in 2009 and 2010 at the American Psychiatric Association annual meeting designed to bring clinicians some commonly used adult research measures with broad applicability to …
Abstract Quality Issue:
This abstract appears to be incomplete or contains metadata (41 words).
Try re-searching for a better abstract.
| Reference Key |
j2011innovationsthe
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Busner J;Kaplan SL;Greco N;Sheehan DV;; |
| Journal | innovations in clinical neuroscience |
| Year | 2011 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.