Corrigendum: Sentiment Analysis in the Sales Review of Indonesian Marketplace by Utilizing Support Vector Machine

Clicks: 353
ID: 11766
2018
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #39 of 92 articles by views in journal of information systems engineering and business intelligence

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
In the version of this article initially published, there were some errors in Section III, Methods and Section VI, Conclusions. In Preprocessing of Methods, there is a sentence “The informal words may be in the form of slang words or abbreviations that are often used in daily life like cp at (from “cepat” or fast), blum (from “belum” or not yet), and gak (from “tidak” or no).”. The correct sentence is “The informal words may be in the form of slang words or abbreviations that are often used in daily life like cpat (from “cepat” or fast), blum (from “belum” or not yet), and gak (from “tidak” or no).”. In Text Classification of Methods, there is a sentence “Where P(B|A) is the probability of B appearance when A is known? The value P(A|B) is the probability of an appearance if B is known. P(A) is the probability of an appearance, while P(B) is the probability of B appearance.”. The correct sentence is “Where P(B│A) is the probability of the appearance of B when A is known. The value of P(A|B) is the probability of the appearance of A if B is known. P(A) is the probability of the appearance of A, while P(B) is the probability of the appearance of B.”. In Conclusions, a sentence “The accuracy reaches 93.42%; using 25% features with highest TF-IDF” should be changed to “The accuracy reaches 93.65%; using 25% features with highest TF-IDF” based on the results in Fig.3. These errors have been corrected in the PDF versions of the article.
Reference Key
lutfi2018corrigendumjournal Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Anang Anggono Lutfi;Adhistya Erna Permanasari;Silmi Fauziati;
Journal journal of information systems engineering and business intelligence
Year 2018
DOI
10.20473/jisebi.4.2.169
URL
https://e-journal.unair.ac.id/JISEBI/article/download/10244/5673
Keywords
motion synthesis;human behaviour

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.