Guidelines for TMS/tES clinical services and research through the COVID-19 pandemic.
Clicks: 446
ID: 117652
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
83.3
/100
446 views
303 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #2 of 9 articles by views in brain stimulation
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has broadly disrupted biomedical treatment and research including non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS). Moreover, the rapid onset of societal disruption and evolving regulatory restrictions may not have allowed for systematic planning of how clinical and research work may continue throughout the pandemic or be restarted as restrictions are abated. The urgency to provide and develop NIBS as an intervention for diverse neurological and mental health indications, and as a catalyst of fundamental brain research, is not dampened by the parallel efforts to address the most life-threatening aspects of COVID-19; rather in many cases the need for NIBS is heightened including the potential to mitigate mental health consequences related to COVID-19.To facilitate the re-establishment of access to NIBS clinical services and research operations during the current COVID-19 pandemic and possible future outbreaks, we develop and discuss a framework for balancing the importance of NIBS operations with safety considerations, while addressing the needs of all stakeholders. We focus on Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) and low intensity transcranial Electrical Stimulation (tES) - including transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) and transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS).The present consensus paper provides guidelines and good practices for managing and reopening NIBS clinics and laboratories through the immediate and ongoing stages of COVID-19. The document reflects the analysis of experts with domain-relevant expertise spanning NIBS technology, clinical services, and basic and clinical research - with an international perspective. We outline regulatory aspects, human resources, NIBS optimization, as well as accommodations for specific demographics.A model based on three phases (early COVID-19 impact, current practices, and future preparation) with an 11-step checklist (spanning removing or streamlining in-person protocols, incorporating telemedicine, and addressing COVID-19-associated adverse events) is proposed. Recommendations on implementing social distancing and sterilization of NIBS related equipment, specific considerations of COVID-19 positive populations including mental health comorbidities, as well as considerations regarding regulatory and human resource in the era of COVID-19 are outlined. We discuss COVID-19 considerations specifically for clinical (sub-)populations including pediatric, stroke, addiction, and the elderly. Numerous case-examples across the world are described.There is an evident, and in cases urgent, need to maintain NIBS operations through the COVID-19 pandemic, including anticipating future pandemic waves and addressing effects of COVID-19 on brain and mind. The proposed robust and structured strategy aims to address the current and anticipated future challenges while maintaining scientific rigor and managing risk.
| Reference Key |
biksonguidelinesbrain
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Bikson, Marom;Hanlon, Colleen A;Woods, Adam J;Gillick, Bernadette T;Charvet, Leigh;Lamm, Claus;Madeo, Graziella;Holczer, Adrienn;Almeida, Jorge;Antal, Andrea;Ay, Mohammad Reza;Baeken, Chris;Blumberger, Daniel M;Campanella, Salvatore;Camprodon, Joan A;Christiansen, Lasse;Loo, Colleen;Crinion, Jennifer T;Fitzgerald, Paul;Gallimberti, Luigi;Ghobadi-Azbari, Peyman;Ghodratitoostani, Iman;Grabner, Roland H;Hartwigsen, Gesa;Hirata, Akimasa;Kirton, Adam;Knotkova, Helena;Krupitsky, Evgeny;Marangolo, Paola;Nakamura-Palacios, Ester M;Potok, Weronika;Praharaj, Samir K;Ruff, Christian C;Schlaug, Gottfried;Siebner, Hartwig R;Stagg, Charlotte J;Thielscher, Axel;Wenderoth, Nicole;Yuan, Ti-Fei;Zhang, Xiaochu;Ekhtiari, Hamed; |
| Journal | brain stimulation |
| Year | Year not found |
| DOI |
S1935-861X(20)30109-1
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.