International consensus guidelines on interventional endoscopy in chronic pancreatitis. Recommendations from the working group for the international consensus guidelines for chronic pancreatitis in collaboration with the International Association of Pancreatology, the American Pancreatic Association, the Japan Pancreas Society, and European Pancreatic Club
Clicks: 381
ID: 117549
2020
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
381 views
48 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #1 of 3 articles by views in pancreatology
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
This paper is part of the international consensus guidelines on chronic pancreatitis, presenting for interventional endoscopy. An international working group with experts on interventional endoscopy evaluated 26 statements generated from evidence on 9 clinically relevant questions. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach was used to evaluate the level of evidence. To determine the level of agreement, a nine-point Likert scale was used for voting on the statements. Strong consensus was obtained for 15 statements relating to nine questions including the recommendation that endoscopic intervention should be offered to patients with persistent severe pain but not to those without pain. Endoscopic decompression of the pancreatic duct could be used for immediate pain relief, and then offered surgery if this fails or needs repeated endoscopy. Endoscopic drainage is preferred for portal-splenic vein thrombosis and pancreatic fistula. A plastic stent should be placed and replaced 2–3 months later after insertion. Endoscopic extraction is indicated for stone fragments remaining after ESWL. Interventional treatment should be performed for symptomatic/complicated pancreatic pseudocysts. Endoscopic treatment is recommended for bile duct obstruction and afterwards surgery if this fails or needs repeated endoscopy. Surgery may be offered if there is significant calcification and/or mass of the pancreatic head. Percutaneous endovascular treatment is preferred for hemosuccus pancreaticus. Surgical treatment is recommended for duodenal stenosis due to chronic pancreatitis. This international expert consensus guideline provides evidenced-based statements concerning indications and key aspects for interventional endoscopy in the management of patients with chronic pancreatitis.
| Reference Key |
whitcomb2020pancreatologyinternational
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Masayuki Kitano,T M Gress,Pramod K. Garg,Takao Itoi,Atsushi Irisawa,Hiroyuki Isayama,Atsushi Kanno,Kei Takase,Michael J. Levy,Ichiro Yasuda,Phillipe Lévy,Shuiji Isaji,Carlos Fernandez-Del Castillo,Asbjørn M. Drewes,Andrea R.G. Sheel,John P. Neoptolemos,Tooru Shimosegawa,Marja A. Boermeester,C. Mel Wilcox,David C. Whitcomb;Masayuki Kitano;T M Gress;Pramod K. Garg;Takao Itoi;Atsushi Irisawa;Hiroyuki Isayama;Atsushi Kanno;Kei Takase;Michael J. Levy;Ichiro Yasuda;Phillipe Lévy;Shuiji Isaji;Carlos Fernandez-Del Castillo;Asbjørn M. Drewes;Andrea R.G. Sheel;John P. Neoptolemos;Tooru Shimosegawa;Marja A. Boermeester;C. Mel Wilcox;David C. Whitcomb; |
| Journal | pancreatology |
| Year | 2020 |
| DOI |
10.1016/j.pan.2020.05.022
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.