Comparing de novo assemblers for 454 transcriptome data

Clicks: 461
ID: 116800
2010
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #15 of 121 articles by views in BMC genomics

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 121 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Transcriptome assemblies are smaller than genome assemblies and thus should be more computationally tractable, but are often harder because individual contigs can have highly variable read coverage. Comparing single assemblers, Newbler 2.5 performed best on our trial data set, but other assemblers w …
Reference Key
s2010bmccomparing Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Kumar S;Blaxter ML;;
Journal BMC genomics
Year 2010
DOI
DOI not found
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.