A Comparison of Dacron versus Flocked Nylon Swabs for Anal Cytology Specimen Collection
Clicks: 8
ID: 116547
2011
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
2.1
/100
8 views
2 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #17 of 17 articles by views in acta cytologica
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
We compared the performance of commonly used Dacron versus flocked nylon swabs for anal cytology.From 23 HIV-positive men screened at Kaiser Permanente San Francisco (San Francisco, Calif., USA), 2 anal specimens were collected, 1 with each swab in random ...
Abstract Quality Issue:
This abstract appears to be incomplete or contains metadata (37 words).
Try re-searching for a better abstract.
| Reference Key |
castle2011actaa
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Julia C. Gage, Arpita Ghosh, Sylvia Borgonovo, Stephen Follansbee, Nicolas Wentzensen, Patti E. Gravitt, Niels Grabe, Bernd Lahrmann, Philip E. Castle;Julia C. Gage;Arpita Ghosh;Sylvia Borgonovo;Stephen Follansbee;Nicolas Wentzensen;Patti E. Gravitt;Niels Grabe;Bernd Lahrmann;Philip E. Castle; |
| Journal | acta cytologica |
| Year | 2011 |
| DOI |
10.1159/000329488
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
|
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.