Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: a review of possible methods
Clicks: 354
ID: 116204
2005
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Improving Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
65.7
/100
346 views
298 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
We identify a number of procedural, conceptual and theoretical issues that need to be addressed in moving forward with this area, and emphasise the need for existing techniques to be evaluated and modified, rather than inventing new approaches.
Abstract Quality Issue:
This abstract appears to be incomplete or contains metadata (38 words).
Try re-searching for a better abstract.
| Reference Key |
m2005journalsynthesising
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Dixon-Woods M;Agarwal S;Jones D;Young B;Sutton A;; |
| Journal | journal of health services research & policy |
| Year | 2005 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
systematic review
National Center for Biotechnology Information
NCBI
NLM
MEDLINE
review
pubmed abstract
nih
national institutes of health
national library of medicine
research support
non-u.s. gov't
meta-analysis as topic
united kingdom
evidence-based medicine*
pmid:15667704
doi:10.1177/135581960501000110
mary dixon-woods
shona agarwal
alex sutton
bayes theorem
health services research / methods*
|
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.