A comparative study of concomitant boost radiation versus concomitant boost with concurrent chemoradiation versus standard fractionation chemoradiation in locally advanced head-and-neck cancer
Clicks: 245
ID: 116166
1970
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Popular Article
63.7
/100
245 views
193 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
PopularRanked #84 of 148 articles by views in journal of cancer research and therapeutics
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 148 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
All three groups have similar response rates and DFS with manageable toxicity.
Abstract Quality Issue:
This abstract appears to be incomplete or contains metadata (12 words).
Try re-searching for a better abstract.
| Reference Key |
p1970journala
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Gupta P;Dhull AK;Kaushal V;; |
| Journal | journal of cancer research and therapeutics |
| Year | 1970 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.