Comparative Study of Tubular Solar Stills with Phase Change Material and Nano-Enhanced Phase Change Material

Clicks: 178
ID: 115728
2020
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #179 of 220 articles by views in energies

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 220 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
This study is intended to investigate and analyze the operational performances of the Conventional Tubular Solar Still (CTSS), Tubular Solar Still with Phase Change Material (TSS-PCM) and Tubular Solar Still with Nano Phase Change Material (TSS-NPCM). Paraffin wax and graphene plusparaffin wax were used in the CTSS to obtain the modified solar still models. The experimental study was carried out in the three stills to observe the operational parameters at a water depth of 1 cm. The experiment revealed that TSS-NPCM showed the best performance and the highest yield in comparison to other stills. The distillate yield from the CTSS, TSS-PCM and TSS-NPCM was noted to be 4.3, 6.0 and 7.9 kg, respectively, the daily energy efficiency of the stills was observed to be 31%, 46% and 59%, respectively, and the daily exergy efficiency of the stills was recorded to be 1.67%, 2.20% and 3.75%, respectively. As the performance of the TSS-NPCM was enhanced, the cost of freshwater yield obtained was also low in contrast to the other two types of stills.
Reference Key
thalib2020energiescomparative Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors M. Mohamed Thalib;Athikesavan Muthu Manokar;Fadl A. Essa;N. Vasimalai;Ravishankar Sathyamurthy;Fausto Pedro Garcia Marquez;Thalib, M. Mohamed;Manokar, Athikesavan Muthu;Essa, Fadl A.;Vasimalai, N.;Sathyamurthy, Ravishankar;Garcia Marquez, Fausto Pedro;
Journal energies
Year 2020
DOI
10.3390/en13153989
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.