Plague: past, present, and future

Clicks: 343
ID: 114739
2008
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Popular

Ranked #37 of 78 articles by views in plos medicine

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
The authors argue that plague should be taken much more seriously by the international health community.
Reference Key
nc2008plosplague: Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Stenseth NC;Atshabar BB;Begon M;Belmain SR;Bertherat E;Carniel E;Gage KL;Leirs H;Rahalison L;;
Journal plos medicine
Year 2008
DOI
DOI not found
URL
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18198939
Keywords
National Center for Biotechnology Information NCBI NLM MEDLINE review animals humans pubmed abstract nih national institutes of health national library of medicine Forecasting plague / epidemiology* disease outbreaks plague / microbiology global health disease reservoirs siphonaptera / microbiology pmid:18198939 pmc2194748 doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0050003 nils chr stenseth bakyt b atshabar lila rahalison bioterrorism birds / parasitology endemic diseases insect vectors / microbiology mammals / parasitology plague / prevention & control plague / transmission travel yersinia pestis / physiology yersinia pseudotuberculosis / physiology

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.