A comparative study of landslide susceptibility maps produced using support vector machine with different kernel functions and entropy data mining models in China
Clicks: 394
ID: 113976
2017
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Popular Article
73.5
/100
394 views
251 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
PopularRanked #2 of 9 articles by views in bulletin of engineering geology and the environment
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The main aim of this study was to apply and compare two GIS-based data mining models, namely support vector machine (SVM) by four kernel functions (linear-SVM, polynomial-SVM, radial basic function-SVM, and sigmoidal-SVM) and entropy models in landslide susceptibility mapping, in Shangzhou District, China. Initially, 145 landslide locations were mapped using early reports, aerial photographs, and supported by field surveys. Subsequently, landslides in the study area were divided randomly into training and validation datasets (70/30) using ArcGIS 10.0 software. In the current study, 14 landslide conditioning factors, namely, slope aspect, slope angle, profile curvature, plan curvature, altitude, topographic wetness index (TWI), stream power index (SPI), sediment transport index (STI), normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), distance from roads, distance from rivers, distance from faults, rainfall, and lithology, were exploited to detect the most susceptible areas. In the next step, landslide susceptibility maps generated by four types of SVM or entropy models were produced. Finally, validation of the landslide susceptibility maps produced by different models was evaluated using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves. The results showed that the entropy model exhibited the highest success rate (0.7610), followed by polynomial-SVM (0.7526), the sigmoidal-SVM (0.7518), radial basic function-SVM (0.7446), and linear-SVM (0.7390) models. Similarly, the ROC plots also showed that the prediction rates gave almost similar results. The entropy model had the highest prediction rate (0.7599), followed by polynomial-SVM (0.7259), sigmoidal-SVM (0.7203), radial basic function-SVM (0.7149), and linear-SVM (0.7009) models. Hence, it can be concluded that the five models used in this study gave close results, with the entropy model exhibiting best performance in landslide susceptibility mapping.
| Reference Key |
chen2017bulletina
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Wei Chen;Hamid Reza Pourghasemi;Seyed Amir Naghibi;Wei Chen;Hamid Reza Pourghasemi;Seyed Amir Naghibi; |
| Journal | bulletin of engineering geology and the environment |
| Year | 2017 |
| DOI |
doi:10.1007/s10064-017-1010-y
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.