Acknowledgement to Reviewers of Fishes in 2018
Clicks: 199
ID: 113123
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
199 views
31 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #126 of 163 articles by views in fishes
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 163 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Rigorous peer-review is the corner-stone of high-quality academic publishing [...]
Abstract Quality Issue:
This abstract appears to be incomplete or contains metadata (9 words).
Try re-searching for a better abstract.
| Reference Key |
office2019fishesacknowledgement
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Fishes Editorial Office;Fishes Editorial Office,; |
| Journal | fishes |
| Year | 2019 |
| DOI |
10.3390/fishes4010004
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.