Shallow Landslide Susceptibility Mapping: A Comparison between Logistic Model Tree, Logistic Regression, Naïve Bayes Tree, Artificial Neural Network, and Support Vector Machine Algorithms

Clicks: 357
ID: 113021
2020
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #199 of 862 articles by views in International journal of environmental research and public health

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 862 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Shallow landslides damage buildings and other infrastructure, disrupt agriculture practices, and can cause social upheaval and loss of life. As a result, many scientists study the phenomenon, and some of them have focused on producing landslide susceptibility maps that can be used by land-use manage …
Reference Key
vh2020internationalshallow Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Nhu VH;Shirzadi A;Shahabi H;Singh SK;Al-Ansari N;Clague JJ;Jaafari A;Chen W;Miraki S;Dou J;Luu C;Górski K;Thai Pham B;Nguyen HD;Ahmad BB;;
Journal International journal of environmental research and public health
Year 2020
DOI
DOI not found
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.