Identifying, documenting, and examining heterogeneity in systematic reviews of complex interventions

Clicks: 334
ID: 112433
2013
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #20 of 75 articles by views in journal of clinical epidemiology

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
This article describes approaches for planning, dealing, and analyzing heterogeneity in a systematic review of complex interventions. Approaches aim to generate a priori hypotheses of the mechanism of action of a complex intervention to identify the key variables that might contribute to variation a …
Reference Key
t2013journalidentifying, Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Pigott T;Shepperd S;;
Journal journal of clinical epidemiology
Year 2013
DOI
DOI not found
URL
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=23953079&dopt=Abstract
Keywords
National Center for Biotechnology Information NCBI NLM MEDLINE humans pubmed abstract nih national institutes of health national library of medicine statistical* review literature as topic* data interpretation pmid:23953079 doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.06.013 terri pigott sasha shepperd guidelines as topic research design*

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.