Identifying, documenting, and examining heterogeneity in systematic reviews of complex interventions
Clicks: 241
ID: 112433
2013
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Improving Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
79.7
/100
231 views
188 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
This article describes approaches for planning, dealing, and analyzing heterogeneity in a systematic review of complex interventions. Approaches aim to generate a priori hypotheses of the mechanism of action of a complex intervention to identify the key variables that might contribute to variation a …
| Reference Key |
t2013journalidentifying,
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Pigott T;Shepperd S;; |
| Journal | journal of clinical epidemiology |
| Year | 2013 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
National Center for Biotechnology Information
NCBI
NLM
MEDLINE
humans
pubmed abstract
nih
national institutes of health
national library of medicine
statistical*
review literature as topic*
data interpretation
pmid:23953079
doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.06.013
terri pigott
sasha shepperd
guidelines as topic
research design*
|
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.