The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration
Clicks: 550
ID: 112108
2009
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Popular Article
30.0
/100
550 views
43 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
PopularRanked #1 of 75 articles by views in journal of clinical epidemiology
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are essential to summarize evidence relating to efficacy and safety of health care interventions accurately and reliably. The clarity and transparency of these reports, however, is not optimal. Poor reporting of systematic reviews diminishes their value to clinic …
Abstract Quality Issue:
This abstract appears to be incomplete or contains metadata (42 words).
Try re-searching for a better abstract.
| Reference Key |
a2009journalthe
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Liberati A;Altman DG;Tetzlaff J;Mulrow C;Gøtzsche PC;Ioannidis JP;Clarke M;Devereaux PJ;Kleijnen J;Moher D;; |
| Journal | journal of clinical epidemiology |
| Year | 2009 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
systematic review
National Center for Biotechnology Information
NCBI
NLM
MEDLINE
humans
pubmed abstract
nih
national institutes of health
national library of medicine
research support
non-u.s. gov't
guideline
david moher
alessandro liberati
meta-analysis as topic*
publishing / standards*
quality control
review literature as topic*
consensus development conference
pmid:19631507
doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.006
douglas g altman
evidence-based medicine / standards
terminology as topic
|
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.