The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration

Clicks: 444
ID: 112108
2009
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality Improving Quality
0.0 /100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are essential to summarize evidence relating to efficacy and safety of health care interventions accurately and reliably. The clarity and transparency of these reports, however, is not optimal. Poor reporting of systematic reviews diminishes their value to clinic …
Reference Key
a2009journalthe Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Liberati A;Altman DG;Tetzlaff J;Mulrow C;Gøtzsche PC;Ioannidis JP;Clarke M;Devereaux PJ;Kleijnen J;Moher D;;
Journal journal of clinical epidemiology
Year 2009
DOI
DOI not found
URL
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=19631507&dopt=Abstract
Keywords
systematic review National Center for Biotechnology Information NCBI NLM MEDLINE humans pubmed abstract nih national institutes of health national library of medicine research support non-u.s. gov't guideline david moher alessandro liberati meta-analysis as topic* publishing / standards* quality control review literature as topic* consensus development conference pmid:19631507 doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.006 douglas g altman evidence-based medicine / standards terminology as topic

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.