Prophylactic antibiotics in common dog bite wounds: a controlled study
Clicks: 423
ID: 111937
1980
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Improving Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
5.1
/100
17 views
17 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
A double-blind prospective study of 98 patients was carried out, but 57 (58%) returned for follow-up and form the basis of this report. Wound irrigation and debridement were found to be important in reducing infection. Hand wounds were most likely to become infected; face and scalp wounds were at lo …
| Reference Key |
m1980annalsprophylactic
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Callaham M;; |
| Journal | Annals of emergency medicine |
| Year | 1980 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
National Center for Biotechnology Information
NCBI
NLM
MEDLINE
animals
humans
pubmed abstract
nih
national institutes of health
national library of medicine
adult
adolescent
Child
Prospective Studies
Clinical Trial
Double-Blind Method
controlled clinical trial
risk
wound infection / microbiology
debridement
pmid:6902630
doi:10.1016/s0196-0644(80)80153-3
m callaham
bites and stings / complications*
bites and stings / therapy
dogs
penicillin resistance
penicillins / therapeutic use*
sutures
wound infection / etiology
wound infection / prevention & control*
|
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.