Reply to Newton et al
Clicks: 106
ID: 111182
2005
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
106 views
11 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #728 of 1,084 articles by views in clinical infectious diseases
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 1,084 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Sir—We thank Drs. Newton, Day, and White [1] for the stimulating and valid criticisms of our recently published letter [2]. We believe that the main contributio
Abstract Quality Issue:
This abstract appears to be incomplete or contains metadata (25 words).
Try re-searching for a better abstract.
| Reference Key |
carlos2005clinicalreply
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Franco-Paredes, Carlos;Dismukes, Roberta;Nicolls, Deborah;Kozarsky, Phyllis E.; |
| Journal | clinical infectious diseases |
| Year | 2005 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
|
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.