Comparison of Premier™ Rotaclone®, ProSpecT™, and RIDASCREEN® rotavirus enzyme immunoassay kits for detection of rotavirus antigen in stool specimens
Clicks: 417
ID: 111069
2013
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Improving Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
Star Article
85.0
/100
410 views
331 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
Our study found that all three kits are suitable for use by rotavirus surveillance programs.
Abstract Quality Issue:
This abstract appears to be incomplete or contains metadata (15 words).
Try re-searching for a better abstract.
| Reference Key |
r2013journalcomparison
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Gautam R;Lyde F;Esona MD;Quaye O;Bowen MD;; |
| Journal | journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the pan american society for clinical virology |
| Year | 2013 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
National Center for Biotechnology Information
NCBI
NLM
MEDLINE
humans
pubmed abstract
nih
national institutes of health
national library of medicine
research support
non-u.s. gov't
u.s. gov't
Child
Infant
Comparative Study
P.H.S.
preschool
Antigens
sensitivity and specificity
Evaluation Study
viral / analysis*
reagent kits
pmid:23850415
pmc4602374
doi:10.1016/j.jcv.2013.06.022
rashi gautam
freda lyde
michael d bowen
clinical laboratory techniques / methods*
feces / virology*
immunoenzyme techniques / methods
diagnostic
rotavirus / immunology*
rotavirus infections / diagnosis*
|
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.