Underwater Soundscape Monitoring and Fish Bioacoustics: A Review

Clicks: 317
ID: 110417
2018
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #50 of 163 articles by views in fishes

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 163 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Soundscape ecology is a rapidly growing field with approximately 93% of all scientific articles on this topic having been published since 2010 (total about 610 publications since 1985). Current acoustic technology is also advancing rapidly, enabling new devices with voluminous data storage and automatic signal detection to define sounds. Future uses of passive acoustic monitoring (PAM) include biodiversity assessments, monitoring habitat health, and locating spawning fishes. This paper provides a review of ambient sound and soundscape ecology, fish acoustic monitoring, current recording and sampling methods used in long-term PAM, and parameters/metrics used in acoustic data analysis.
Reference Key
lindseth2018fishesunderwater Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Adelaide V. Lindseth;Phillip S. Lobel;Lindseth, Adelaide V.;Lobel, Phillip S.;
Journal fishes
Year 2018
DOI
10.3390/fishes3030036
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.