Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Use of the Diode Laser in the Reduction of the Volume of the Edematous Gingival Tissue after Causal Therapy
Clicks: 207
ID: 110017
2020
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Improving Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
7.2
/100
24 views
24 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare two different techniques for the treatment of plaque-induced gingivitis, demonstrating whether the causal therapy supported by diode laser can allow a resolution of the edema caused by gingivitis in less time compared to the single traditional causal therapy. Materials and methods: Twenty-five patients between 20 and 60 years of age with a specific diagnosis of gingivitis were evaluated at the CLID-HSR oral hygiene department. Once the clinical parameters (bleeding index, plaque index, recession, and clinical attack level) were recorded, each of them was subjected to a professional oral hygiene session and instructed in correct home hygiene procedures. Through a split-mouth protocol for each individual patient, hemi-arches were treated by simple randomization to be treated with causal therapy supported by the action of the diode laser (experimental therapy) and which with traditional causal therapy (control therapy). A first intraoral scan was performed before therapy (T0), which was repeated 20 min after rinsing with CHX. The intraoral scans were repeated at a control 7 (T1) and 14 days (T2) after the session. For each intraoral scan, a volumetric value was calculated, proportional to the edema of the gingival tissues, using special digital software. The operator who carried out the volumetric measurements on the software was not aware of the therapy implemented on each half-arch. The operator who carried out the statistical analysis was not aware of the therapy applied to each group. The collected data were statistically compared in order to detect any differences between the volumetric variations between the two therapy groups and within the therapy groups over time. After evaluating the distribution of data by means of the Kolmogorov-Smirnov statistical test, the appropriate nonparametric tests were chosen to carry out the statistical comparisons. Results: Based on the analysis of the gingival-periodontal health parameters and the volumetric value of the treated areas, no statistically significant differences were detected between the areas treated with the adjuvant action of the diode laser compared to those treated with causal therapy alone. Conclusions: With the limitations of this study, in accordance with the statistical results obtained, diode laser therapy does not allow a faster resolution of gingival edema compared to traditional therapy; the two treatment techniques for plaque-induced gingivitis, therefore, have the same efficacy.
Abstract Quality Issue:
This abstract appears to be incomplete or contains metadata (375 words).
Try re-searching for a better abstract.
| Reference Key |
polizzi2020internationalevaluation
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Elisabetta Polizzi;Giulia Tetè;Claudia Targa;Barbara Salviato;Francesco Ferrini;Giorgio Gastaldi;Polizzi, Elisabetta;Tetè, Giulia;Targa, Claudia;Salviato, Barbara;Ferrini, Francesco;Gastaldi, Giorgio; |
| Journal | International journal of environmental research and public health |
| Year | 2020 |
| DOI |
10.3390/ijerph17176192
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
diode laser
periodontal disease
plaque-induced gingivitis
gingivitis managing
diode laser
periodontal disease
plaque-induced gingivitis
gingivitis managing
National Center for Biotechnology Information
NCBI
NLM
MEDLINE
pubmed abstract
nih
national institutes of health
national library of medicine
pmid:32859022
doi:10.3390/ijerph17176192
elisabetta polizzi
giulia tetè
giorgio gastaldi
|
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.