COMPARISON OF CLASSIC AND GREEDY HEURISTIC ALGORITHM RESULTS IN INTEGER PROGRAMMING: KNAPSACK PROBLEMS
Clicks: 371
ID: 10923
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
73.2
/100
371 views
261 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #15 of 68 articles by views in mugla journal of science and technology
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
This study is designed to investigate the comparison of Greedy and classic algorithm solution results and the results of solution algorithms for integer linear programming (ILP) problems. The purpose of the study is to examine the heuristic Greedy algorithm that solves the ILP problems and to reveal the differences and similarities between the classic and heuristic Greedy algorithms on the application. For this purpose, a software (JAVA Program) which solves Knapsack Problems (KP) with Greedy terminology has been developed and problems in different models have been solved with objective function and constraints. The problems are solved by both the conventional classic algorithm and the Greedy algorithm and the solution results are compared. In the study, the results of pure and (0-1) binary backpack problems were found to be the same as those of heuristic algorithms for small problems. In addition, the developed program solves single and two-dimensional KP in the literature.
| Reference Key |
durmus2019comparisonmugla
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Burcu Durmuş;Öznur İşçi Güneri;Aynur İncekırık; |
| Journal | mugla journal of science and technology |
| Year | 2019 |
| DOI |
10.22531/muglajsci.469475
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.