Evaluation of rapid antigen test for detection of SARS-CoV-2 virus.

Clicks: 278
ID: 108161
2020
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #13 of 20 articles by views in journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the pan american society for clinical virology

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
The rapid diagnosis of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients is essential to reduce the disease spread. Rapid antigen detection (RAD) tests are available, however, there is scanty data on the performance of RAD tests.To evaluate the performance of the commercially available BIOCREDIT COVID-19 Ag test and compare it with RT-PCR for detecting Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus. Analytical sensitivity for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 virus was determined for the RAD test using viral culture and RT-PCR as reference methods. The RAD test was further evaluated using respiratory samples collected from confirmed COVID-19 patients. The results were compared with RT-PCR test.The detection limits between RAD test, viral culture and RT-PCR varied hugely. RAD was 10 fold less sensitive than viral culture while RAD was 10 fold less sensitive than RT-PCR. The RAD test detected between 11.1 % and 45.7 % of RT-PCR-positive samples from COVID-19 patients.This study demonstrated that the RAD test serves only as adjunct to RT-PCR test because of potential for false-negative results.
Reference Key
mak2020evaluationjournal Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Mak, Gannon Ck;Cheng, Peter Kc;Lau, Stephen Sy;Wong, Kitty Ky;Lau, C S;Lam, Edman Tk;Chan, Rickjason Cw;Tsang, Dominic Nc;
Journal journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the pan american society for clinical virology
Year 2020
DOI
S1386-6532(20)30242-0
URL
Keywords
viral culture rt-pcr covid-19 sars-cov-2 2019 novel coronavirus rapid antigen detection

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.