Spatiotemporal supply-demand characteristics and economic benefits of crop water footprint in the semi-arid region.

Clicks: 157
ID: 107859
2020
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #609 of 637 articles by views in The Science of the total environment

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 637 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
The notion of water footprint provides a novel perspective for understanding the relationship between physical water and virtual water, especially in agricultural production. In this study, with the help of CROPWAT 8.0 model, we estimate the water footprint requirement (WFr) of main crops growth for 2005, 2010 and 2015 in Zhangjiakou City, an extreme water shortage region in northern China, and three new indicators are introduced, i.e., green water footprint occupancy rate (GWFor), blue water footprint deficit (BWFd), and virtual water consumption per output value (VWV). The results indicate that the total WFr increased from 1.671 billion m to 1.852 billion m during the study period, of which the green water was always about twice as the blue water. Cereals, as the main staple food, had the largest WFr, while the WFr of potatoes increased the fastest, which was the result of large-scale promotion of potato cultivation in recent years. The spatial characteristics of the GWFor and BWFd are closely related to altitude, that is, the GWFor was less than 50% in higher-altitude Bashang area, while it was more than 50% in lower-altitude Baxia area, and the BWFd was generally smaller in Bashang area than in Baxia area. Due to differences in crop types and food prices, higher water footprint food productivity does not absolutely mean higher water footprint economic productivity. Therefore, it is vital to consider from two perspectives (food yields priority or economic benefits priority) to formulate a reasonable water footprint utilization policy. This study is expected to broaden the investigation of crop water footprint and make a contribution to sustainable agricultural water management.
Reference Key
ma2020spatiotemporalthe Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Ma, Weijing;Opp, Christian;Yang, Dewei;
Journal The Science of the total environment
Year 2020
DOI
S0048-9697(20)33019-9
URL
Keywords
blue water deficit crop water footprint economic benefits green water occupancy rate zhangjiakou city

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.