Use of oral anticoagulants after ischaemic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation and cancer.
Clicks: 387
ID: 106300
2020
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
76.4
/100
387 views
244 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #1 of 6 articles by views in journal of internal medicine
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
The use of oral anticoagulants (OACs) among patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) has increased in the last decade. We aimed to describe temporal trends in the utilisation of OACs for secondary prevention after ischaemic stroke among patients with AF and active cancer.This is a cross-sectional and cohort study of patients with active cancer (n=1518) and without cancer (n=50 953) in the Swedish national register Riksstroke, including all patients with ischaemic stroke between 1 July 2005 and 30 December 2017, discharged with AF. Prescription and dispensation before and after the introduction of non-vitamin K OACs (NOACs) in late 2011 were compared. We used logistic and Cox regression to analyse associations with OAC use, adjusting for hospital clustering and the competing risk of death.The proportion of cancer patients with AF prescribed OACs at discharge after ischaemic stroke increased by 40.2% after 2011, compared with 69.3% in non-cancer patients during the same period. Stroke and bleeding risk scores remained similar between patients with and without cancer. OAC dispensation during the following year did not increase as much in cancer patients (43.8% to 64.5%) as that in non-cancer patients (46.0% to 74.9%), and the median time to OAC dispensation or censoring was significantly longer in cancer patients (94 vs. 30 days).OAC treatment in post-stroke patients with AF and active cancer has increased after the introduction of NOACs. However, the growing treatment gap in these patients compared to that in non-cancer patients raises the possibility of underutilisation.
| Reference Key |
atterman2020usejournal
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Atterman, Adriano;Asplund, Kjell;Friberg, Leif;Engdahl, Johan; |
| Journal | journal of internal medicine |
| Year | 2020 |
| DOI |
10.1111/joim.13092
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.