Single and double embryo transfer provide similar live birth rates in frozen cycles.
Clicks: 202
ID: 106012
2020
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Improving Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
3.3
/100
11 views
11 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
Do live birth rates (LBRs) differ in frozen cycles of women who received single versus double embryo transfer? Retrospective cohort study including women who underwent their first frozen embryo transfer (FET) in a tertiary referral University Hospital between 2009-2014. 3601 patients were included in the analysis with 1936 (53.8%) having a single embryo transfer (SET) and 1665 (46.2%) having a double embryo transfer (DET). Overall, 657/3601 (18.24%) had a live birth. LBR were similar between SET and DET either for cleavage [100/757 (13.1%) versus 153/1032 (14.8%), = .33] or blastocyst stage FET [256/1179 (21.7%) versus 148/633 (23.4%), = .4). Ongoing pregnancy rates were comparable between DET and SET [316/1665 (18.9%) versus 359/1936 (18.5%)]. Multiple delivery rates were significantly higher in women with DET compared to SET [53/316 (16.7%) versus 7/359 (1.9%), < .001]. Multivariate logistic regression analysis allowing adjustment for relevant confounders showed that the number of embryos transferred in the frozen cycle was not related to LBR. This is the largest study providing evidence that both SET and DET may result in similar LBR, albeit multiple pregnancy rates are significantly lower in case of SET. Therefore, SET should be the main strategy in women undergoing FET.
| Reference Key |
racca2020singlegynecological
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Racca, A;Drakopoulos, P;Van Landuyt, L;Willem, C;Santos-Ribeiro, S;Tournaye, H;Blockeel, C;Polyzos, N P; |
| Journal | gynecological endocrinology : the official journal of the international society of gynecological endocrinology |
| Year | 2020 |
| DOI |
10.1080/09513590.2020.1712697
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.