Čínská literárnost: pojem a téma // Chinese literariness: concept and theme
Clicks: 200
ID: 105637
2017
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Improving Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
2.4
/100
8 views
8 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
The works of critics as dissimilar, in almost every other respect, as Shklovsky, Tynianov, Vodicka,
Paul de Man, etc. show the usefulness of “comparative approach” to the general concept of “literariness”,
however heterogeneously it may be put to work. The author of the essay argues that the distinction
Literariness vs. Literature corresponds with the idea of autonomous worlds of literariness
from the typological point of view in the global inequality; it presents the field of “comparative literature”
as a way of reading and re-reading in unexpected ways of devices and vices. Chinese literariness
as a typological, historically closed and theoretically productive in-between of Sinology and
comparative literature.
| Reference Key |
kral2017nskasvt
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Král, Oldřich; |
| Journal | svět literatury |
| Year | 2017 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.