Repair of cartilage defects with periosteal grafts.
Clicks: 398
ID: 105589
2005
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
398 views
33 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #1 of 2 articles by views in british journal of plastic surgery
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Alternative sources for repair of cartilage defects are limited and donor sites are associated with morbidity. It is known that cartilage development from periosteal grafts is possible. Various factors have been found positively to affect this process in experimental settings. However, all of these studies were limited to joint cartilage. We conducted an experimental study in rabbits for the investigation of the elastic cartilage regeneration from perichondrial and periosteal grafts together with the effects of hyaluronan on this process. 1 x 1 cm(2) cartilage defects were created on the elastic ear cartilage of rabbits. Four experimental groups with 18 ears in each group were created: Group 1 (repair with perichondrium graft), group 2 (repair with periosteum graft), group 3 (repair with periosteum graft+hyaluronan), group 4 (defect-only control group). Macroscopic and microscopic evaluations were done on the 4th, 8th and 12th weeks. Cellular morphology of the regenerated cartilage and its integration and similarity with adjacent cartilage were evaluated. Cartilage regeneration groups 1, 2 and 3 were found to be statistically different from the control group. There was not a significant difference between groups 1 and 2 or 2 and 3. There is no significant difference between perichondrial and periosteal grafts in cartilage regeneration, and hyaluronan has no beneficial effect on this process.
| Reference Key |
ulutas2005repairbritish
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Ulutaş, Kutay;Menderes, Adnan;Karaca, Can;Ozkal, Sermin; |
| Journal | british journal of plastic surgery |
| Year | 2005 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | URL not found |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.