Survey and Criticism of Izutsu's Semantic Approach to Holy Quran

Clicks: 291
ID: 105248
2013
Free PDF
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Steady

Ranked #1 of 2 articles by views in حکمت معاصر

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Professor Toshihiko Izutsu, a Japanese Linguists, philosopher and Quranic scholar (1914-1993), in addition to his famous Japanese translation of Quran, has two main quranic books named: God and Men in Quran and Ethico-Religious concepts of Quran. In the two books basic structures of Quranic teachings have been expressed and explained. He is counted as one of followers of Ethno-linguistic school or Bon School that is one of the famous semantic schools. According to this school, each language has its own worldview. Izutsu from the school framework, studied keywords of Quran with a semantic approach, wanted to discover the meaning connections of words in a vast semantic network, in order to achieve a coherent conceptual system of Quran. He has used two semantic methods; historical and synchronic analysis. In synchronic one, he uses seven methods which have been surveyed in this article. Our main criticisms of Izutsu in this article are in these headlines: Having no attention to sentence semantic; inter-textuality; contextuality of meaning; unfamiliarity with diverse semantic schools; having no attention to the differences of opinions after descending Quran period; Having no obvious standard in to identify the axial words; and taking a mere philosophical approach to study Islamic views and neglecting rhetorical sciences.
Reference Key
sharifi2013survey Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Sharifi, Ali;
Journal حکمت معاصر
Year 2013
DOI
DOI not found
URL
http://wisdom.ihcs.ac.ir/article_910_ae1c8b8f8012c241d8fb3ae99299403f.pdf
Keywords
Medicine (General) Medicine Language. Linguistic theory. Comparative grammar Science İslam neoplasms. tumors. oncology. including cancer and carcinogens philosophy. psychology. religion philosophy (general)

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.