Diesel Engine Exhaust Exposure, Smoking, and Lung Cancer Subtype Risks: A Pooled Exposure-response Analysis of 14 Case-control Studies.

Clicks: 303
ID: 104739
2020
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Emerging

Ranked #14 of 16 articles by views in american journal of respiratory and critical care medicine

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
We expanded upon a previous pooled case-control analysis on diesel engine exhaust and lung cancer by including 3 additional studies and quantitative exposure assessment to evaluate lung cancer and subtype risks associated with occupational exposure to diesel exhaust, characterized by elemental carbon (EC) concentrations.We used a quantitative EC job-exposure matrix for exposure assessment. Unconditional logistic regression models were used to calculate lung cancer odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) associated with various metrics of EC exposure. Lung cancer excess lifetime risks (ELR) were calculated using life-tables accounting for all-cause mortality. Additional stratified analyses by smoking history and lung cancer subtypes were performed in men.Our study included 16,901 cases and 20,965 controls. In men, exposure-response between EC and lung cancer was observed: ORs ranged from 1.09 (95% CI 1.00, 1.18) to 1.41 (95% CI 1.30, 1.52) for the lowest and highest cumulative exposure groups, respectively. EC-exposed men had elevated risks in all lung cancer subtypes investigated; associations were strongest for squamous and small cell carcinomas and weaker for adenocarcinoma. EC-lung cancer exposure-response was observed in men regardless of smoking history, including among never smokers. ELR associated with 45 years of EC exposure at 50, 20, and 1 μg/m3 were 3.0%, 0.99%, and, 0.04%, respectively, for both sexes combined.We observed a consistent exposure-response relationship between EC exposure and lung cancer in men. Reduction of workplace EC levels to background environmental levels will further reduce lung cancer ELR in exposed workers.
Reference Key
ge2020dieselamerican Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Ge, Calvin;Peters, Susan;Olsson, Ann;Portengen, Lützen;Schüz, Joachim;Almansa, Josué;Ahrens, Wolfgang;Bencko, Vladimir;Benhamou, Simone;Boffetta, Paolo;Bueno-de-Mesquita, Bas;Caporaso, Neil;Consonni, Dario;Demers, Paul;Fabiánová, Eleonóra;Fernández-Tardón, Guillermo;Field, John;Forastiere, Francesco;Foretova, Lenka;Guénel, Pascal;Gustavsson, Per;Janout, Vladimir;Jöckel, Karl-Heinz;Karrasch, Stefan;Landi, Maria Teresa;Lissowska, Jolanta;Luce, Danièle;Mates, Dana;McLaughlin, John;Merletti, Franco;Mirabelli, Dario;Pándics, Tamás;Parent, Marie-Élise;Plato, Nils;Pohlabeln, Hermann;Richiardi, Lorenzo;Siemiatycki, Jack;Świątkowska, Beata;Tardón, Adonina;Wichmann, Heinz-Erich;Zaridze, David;Straif, Kurt;Kromhout, Hans;Vermeulen, Roel;
Journal american journal of respiratory and critical care medicine
Year 2020
DOI
10.1164/rccm.201911-2101OC
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.