Comparison of oligosaccharide labeling employing reductive amination and hydrazone formation chemistries.
Clicks: 238
ID: 104543
2020
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Improving Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
6.9
/100
23 views
23 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
In this work, we compare labeling by two negatively charged fluorescent labels, 8-aminopyrene-1,3,6-trisulfonic acid (APTS) and 8-(2-hydrazino-2-oxoethoxy)pyrene-1,3,6-trisulfonic acid (Cascade Blue hydrazide [CBH]). Effectiveness of the labeling chemistries were investigated by 4-hydroxybenzaldehyde and maltoheptaose followed by LC/UV-MS and CE/LIF analysis, respectively. The reaction yield of APTS labeling was determined to be only ∼10%. This is due to reduction of almost 90% of the analyte by sodium cyanoborohydride to alcohol, which cannot be further labeled via reductive amination. However, the CBH labeling provides ∼90% reaction yield based on the LC/UV-MS measurements. The significantly higher labeling yield was also confirmed by CE/LIF measurements. Finally, the more effective hydrazone formation technique of CBH was characterized and applied for N-linked glycan analysis by CE/LIF.
| Reference Key |
krenkova2020comparisonelectrophoresis
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Krenkova, Jana;Dusa, Filip;Cmelik, Richard; |
| Journal | ELECTROPHORESIS |
| Year | 2020 |
| DOI |
10.1002/elps.201900475
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.