The impact of public hospitals' privatization on nurse staffing.
Clicks: 400
ID: 104154
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
70.0
/100
400 views
267 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #7 of 13 articles by views in health care management review
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Privatization is one of the strategies that public hospitals may adopt to remain competitive. Privatized hospitals may implement nurse staffing cuts as a cost-saving mechanism and to increase financial performance. A better understanding of how privatization may affect nurse staffing is important given its association with patient and organizational outcomes.The aim of this study was to examine the impact of not-for-profit (NFP) and for-profit (FP) privatizations of public hospitals on nurse staffing.Based on secondary data sets from the American Hospital Association Annual Survey, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Impact Files, and the Area Health Resources File, this study used a nonexperimental longitudinal design consisting of negative binomial and linear regression models with hospital level and year fixed effects. Our sample consisted of nonfederal and noncritical access, acute care, public hospitals (n = 492) followed from 1997 to 2013 (8,335 hospital-year observations). Nurse staffing was measured as full-time equivalents (FTEs) and skill mix. Privatization was defined as conversion from public to either private NFP or private FP status.FP privatization was associated with greater decreases in registered nurse (RN) staffing FTEs (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 0.93, p = .004) and total nurse staffing FTEs (IRR = 0.93, p = .001), compared with NFP privatization: RN staffing FTEs (IRR = 0.95, p = .003) and total nurse staffing FTEs (IRR = 0.96, p = .007).Overall, privatization was associated with decreased RN FTEs and total nurse staffing FTEs and no changes in licensed practical nurse FTEs and RN skill mix.A close monitoring of nurse staffing level, after privatization, is encouraged to prevent potential deterioration in quality of care.
| Reference Key |
ramamonjiarivelo2019thehealth
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Ramamonjiarivelo, Zo;Hearld, Larry;Weech-Maldonado, Robert; |
| Journal | health care management review |
| Year | 2019 |
| DOI |
10.1097/HMR.0000000000000262
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.