Comparative Analysis of Tools and Approaches for Source Tracking Listeria monocytogenes in a Food Facility Using Whole-Genome Sequence Data
Clicks: 207
ID: 104130
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
30.0
/100
207 views
32 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #159 of 201 articles by views in Frontiers in microbiology
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 201 in total.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
As WGS is increasingly used by food industry to characterize pathogen isolates, users are challenged by the variety of analysis approaches available, ranging from methods that require extensive bioinformatics expertise to commercial software packages. This study aimed to assess the impact of analysis pipelines (i.e., different hqSNP pipelines, a cg/wgMLST pipeline) and the reference genome selection on analysis results (i.e., hqSNP and allelic differences as well as tree topologies) and conclusion drawn. For these comparisons, whole genome sequences were obtained for 40 Listeria monocytogenes isolates collected over 18 years from a cold-smoked salmon facility and 2 other isolates obtained from different facilities as part of academic research activities; WGS data were analyzed with three hqSNP pipelines and two MLST pipelines. After initial clustering using a k-mer based approach, hqSNP pipelines were run using two types of reference genomes: (i) closely related closed genomes (“closed references”) and (ii) high-quality de novo assemblies of the dataset isolates (“draft references”). All hqSNP pipelines identified similar hqSNP difference ranges among isolates in a given cluster; use of different reference genomes showed minimal impacts on hqSNP differences identified between isolate pairs. Allelic differences obtained by wgMLST showed similar ranges as hqSNP differences among isolates in a given cluster; cgMLST consistently showed fewer differences than wgMLST. However, phylogenetic trees and dendrograms, obtained based on hqSNP and cg/wgMLST data, did show some incongruences, typically linked to clades supported by low bootstrap values in the trees. When a hqSNP cutoff was used to classify isolates as “related” or “unrelated,” use of different pipelines yielded a considerable number of discordances; this finding supports that cut-off values are valuable to provide a starting point for an investigation, but supporting and epidemiological evidence should be used to interpret WGS data. Overall, our data suggest that cgMLST-based data analyses provide for appropriate subtype differentiation and can be used without the need for preliminary data analyses (e.g., k-mer based clustering) or external closed reference genomes, simplifying data analyses needs. hqSNP or wgMLST analyses can be performed on the isolate clusters identified by cgMLST to increase the precision on determining the genomic similarity between isolates.
| Reference Key |
jagadeesan2019comparativefrontiers
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Jagadeesan, Balamurugan;Baert, Leen;Wiedmann, Martin;Orsi, Renato H.; |
| Journal | Frontiers in microbiology |
| Year | 2019 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.