A field assessment of bauxite residue rehabilitation strategies.

Clicks: 276
ID: 1039
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score — reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
Popular

Ranked #395 of 637 articles by views in The Science of the total environment

Most read Least read

Bar heights use a square-root scale. Only the 120 most-read articles are drawn; the journal has 637 in total.

Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet minted

Create a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.

5 SUSD one-off · no wallet required
Sign in to mint
Abstract
Bauxite residue, the by-product of the alumina industry, is mainly stored in land-based bauxite residue disposal areas (BRDAs). Environmental concern has been raised due to the large volumes in stockpile, the high alkalinity of the material, as well as the presence of elevated concentrations of trace elements. If not adequately managed, BRDAs can act as a source of pollution. In order to minimize the environmental risk, revegetation is implemented to stabilize the residue against water and wind erosion. Currently, two main approaches are used: the use of amendments or the installation of a capping layer. However, few studies evaluating the long-term success and self-sustainability of the rehabilitation programs have been published. A series of field-established rehabilitation strategies reflecting both direct revegetation and revegetation on capping layer were assessed in terms of both soil and plant quality. Soil physico-chemical properties, including pseudo-total and plant-available fractions of nutrients and trace elements, were determined over a summer and winter seasons and aerial portions of vegetation were analysed for nutrients and trace elements. Failure to adequately lower alkalinity remains the major constraint to long-term rehabilitation success of bauxite residue. This is evidenced from poor soil properties in unamended residue and in residue capped with a shallow soil layer, as well from vegetation displaying excessive concentrations of certain elements. Certain elements exceeded typical ranges for non-contaminated soils (i.e. Cr, Fe, Na, Ni and V), with some showing excessive plant-available fractions (i.e. of Al, As, Cr, Hg and V). Vegetation analysis found excessive uptake of some elements (i.e. of Al, Na, Fe, Cr and V). Future attempts for bauxite residue rehabilitation should include both gypsum and organic amendments, while a capping layer may only be effective if either a deep layer (>1 m) is installed or if the underlying residue is sufficiently treated prior to capping.
Reference Key
di carlo2019a Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Di Carlo, Elisa;Boullemant, Amiel;Courtney, Ronan;
Journal The Science of the total environment
Year 2019
DOI
S0048-9697(19)30425-5
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.