Three distinct recovery patterns following primary total knee arthroplasty: dutch arthroplasty register study of 809 patients.
Clicks: 298
ID: 103675
2020
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
298 views
50 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #11 of 20 articles by views in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is usually effective, although not all patients have satisfactory outcomes. This assumes distinct recovery patterns might exist. Little attention has been paid to determine which patients have worse outcomes. This study attempts to distinguish specific recovery patterns using the Oxford knee score (OKS) during the first postoperative year. The secondary aim was to explore predictors of less favourable recovery patterns.Analysis of patients in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register (LROI) with unilateral primary TKA. Data collected up to one year postoperative was used. To identify subgroups of patients based on OKS, latent class growth modeling (LCGM) was used. Moreover, multivariable multinomial logistic regression analysis was used to explore predictors of class membership.809 Patients completed three OKS during the first year postoperative and were included. LCGM identified 3 groups of patients; 'high risers' (most improvement during first 6-months, good 12-month scores 77%), 'gradual progressors' (continuous improvement during the first year 13%) and 'non responders' (initial improvement and subsequent deterioration to baseline score 10%). Predictors of least favourable class membership (OR, 95%CI) are EQ-5D items: VAS health score (0.83, 0.73-0.95), selfcare (2.22, 1.09-4.54) and anxiety/depression (2.45, 1.33-4.52).Three recovery patterns after TKA were distinguished; 'high risers', 'gradual progressors' and 'non responders'. Worse score on EQ-5D items VAS health, selfcare, and anxiety/depression were correlated with the least favourable 'non responders' recovery pattern.
| Reference Key |
van-egmond2020threeknee
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | van Egmond, Jeroen C;Hesseling, Brechtje;Melles, Marijke;Vehmeijer, Stephan B W;van Steenbergen, Liza N;Mathijssen, Nina M C;Porsius, Jarry T; |
| Journal | Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA |
| Year | 2020 |
| DOI |
10.1007/s00167-020-05969-8
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.