Biobehavioral intervention targeting physical activity behavior change for older Veterans after non-traumatic amputation: A randomized controlled trial.
Clicks: 394
ID: 103576
2020
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
30.0
/100
394 views
42 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #3 of 11 articles by views in pm & r : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
To test the feasibility of a biobehavioral intervention designed to promote physical activity.A randomized, single-blind feasibility trial with a cross-over design.Veterans Administration Medical Center.Military veterans [age: 65.7 (7.8) years; mean (SD)] with non-traumatic lower-limb amputation (LLA), randomized to two groups GROUP1 (n = 16) and GROUP2 (n = 15). Both groups had similar baseline amputation characteristics (level of amputation and time since amputation).Twelve weekly, 30-min telehealth sessions of physical activity behavior-change intervention, with GROUP1 participating in weeks 1-12 and GROUP2 in weeks 13-24. GROUP1 non-contact phase in weeks 13-24 and GROUP2 attention control telehealth phase in weeks 1-12.Feasibility [participant retention, dose goal attainment, intervention acceptability (Intrinsic Motivation Inventory [IMI] Interest and Enjoyment scale), safety] and signal of efficacy [free-living physical activity (accelerometer-based average daily step count), Late Life Function and Disability Index - Disability Scale (LLFDI-DS)].Participant retention rate was high (90%), with 3 participants lost to follow-up during the intervention period. Dose goal attainment was low, with only 10% of participants achieved an a-priori walking dose goal. Intervention was rated as acceptable, with mean IMI Interest and Enjoyment score (5.8) statistically higher than the null value of 5.0 (P = 0.002). There were no between-group differences in adverse event rates (falls: P = 0.19, lower extremity wounds: P = 0.60). There was no signal of efficacy for change in average daily step count (d = -0.15) or LLFDI-DS (d = -0.22 and 0.17 for frequency and limitations scales, respectively).Telehealth delivered biobehavioral intervention resulted in acceptable participant retention, low dose goal attainment, high participant acceptability, and low safety risk, while having no signal of efficacy (physical activity, disability) for people with non-traumatic LLA. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
| Reference Key |
christiansen2020biobehavioralpm
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Christiansen, Cory L;Miller, Matthew J;Kline, Paul W;Fields, Thomas T;Sullivan, William J;Blatchford, Patrick J;Stevens-Lapsley, Jennifer E; |
| Journal | pm & r : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation |
| Year | 2020 |
| DOI |
10.1002/pmrj.12374
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.