Assessment of the readability of patient education materials regarding breast cancer on websites
Clicks: 251
ID: 102351
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
30.0
/100
251 views
31 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
SteadyRanked #7 of 7 articles by views in family practice and palliative care
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Introduction: The Google search engine
is a widely used resource for accessing health-related patient education texts.
Therefore accessible information in the texts should be accurate, up-to-date
and appropriate to the general public health literacy level. In this research,
we aimed to analyze the readability of patient education texts prepared for
breast cancer presented on internet and to evaluate the content of texts.Methods:A total of 200 web sites
at Google search engine were evaluated using the terms “breast cancer and breast mass”. The average
readability level was analyzed using Ateşman and Bezirci-Yilmaz readability formulas.
The texts were also evaluated in terms of the risk factors identified in the
development of breast cancer, the presence of examination and screening methods
that could be used in early diagnosis.Results:A total 64 internet sites
that are in compliance with the research criteria were evaluated. The overall
mean reading level of the texts was found moderate, using the Ateşman formula
and college level according to Bezirci. 18 Web sites had both the risk factors
identified in the development of breast cancer and the methods of screenings.Conclusions: A
total 64 internet sites that are in compliance with the research criteria were
evaluated. The overall mean reading level of the texts was found moderate,
using the Ateşman formula and college level according to Bezirci. 18 Web sites
had both the risk factors identified in the development of breast cancer and
the methods of screenings.
| Reference Key |
aksoy2019assessmentfamily
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Aksoy, Nergis ;Kozanhan, Betul ;Eryilmaz, Mehmet Ali ;Tutar, Mahmut Sami ; |
| Journal | family practice and palliative care |
| Year | 2019 |
| DOI |
DOI not found
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.