Threshold for interpretation of p16 immunostaining in fine-needle aspirate specimens of metastatic oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.
Clicks: 369
ID: 101921
2020
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
30.0
/100
369 views
45 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
EmergingRanked #4 of 22 articles by views in journal of the american society of cytopathology
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Human papilloma virus (HPV)-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (HPV-OPSCC) has been recognized to have an excellent response to treatment and has a distinct pathologic staging. For this reason, HPV testing is recommended in cytology specimens of metastatic OPSCC, although the guidelines for testing are not clearly defined. The aim of the current study was to establish a threshold for interpretation of p16 in aspirates from metastatic OPSCC.Cases diagnosed as metastatic SCC by cytology in neck lymph nodes with concurrent p16 on cytology and on paired surgical specimen or an in situ hybridization (ISH) for HPV were included in the study. Stain intensity and percentage positive cells for p16 was compared with p16 on paired surgical pathology specimens and/or ISH RNA for HPV on cytology specimens.Of the 52 cases diagnosed as metastatic SCC on neck aspirates, paired surgical pathology specimens and/or ISH HPV was available in 17 cases. A p16 expression in ≥10%-15% cells resulted in a sensitivity and negative predictive value of 66% and 37%, respectively. However, when even minimal expression in tumor fragments is considered positive, the negative predictive value increases to 100%.We recommend that even minimal nuclear expression for p16 in viable tumor fragments must be considered as positive in cytology specimens. Expression limited to only background single tumor cells or in a necrotic specimen must be interpreted with caution.
| Reference Key |
manucha2020thresholdjournal
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Manucha, Varsha;Patel, Tejal;Grunes, Dianne;Akhtar, Israh; |
| Journal | journal of the american society of cytopathology |
| Year | 2020 |
| DOI |
S2213-2945(20)30020-X
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.