Spinal Cord Stimulation Infection Rate and Incremental Annual Expenditures: Results From a United States Payer Database.
Clicks: 408
ID: 100095
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Not rated
Combines reader engagement with the AI quality analysis. This
article has not been analysed, so there is no overall score —
reader engagement is measured and shown alongside.
Reader Engagement
Popular Article
30.0
/100
408 views
52 readers
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Readership in this journal
PopularRanked #1 of 4 articles by views in Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society
Most read
Least read
Bar heights use a square-root scale.
Mint this article as an NFT
Not yet mintedCreate a permanent, verifiable on-chain record of this article on the Scimatic Network. The NFT is held in your Journament account, and you can withdraw it to your own wallet at any time.
5
SUSD
one-off · no wallet required
Abstract
Surgical site infections (SSIs) result in significant negative clinical and economic outcomes. The objective of this study is to estimate annual health expenditures associated with spinal cord stimulation (SCS)-related infections.Data from the Truven MarketScan® databases were used to identify patients with an SCS implant (2009-2014) and a continuous health plan enrollment for at least 12-months before and after implant (index date). Annual expenditures were estimated for patients with a device-related infection vs. those without infection since index date. A generalized linear model estimated annual expenditures attributable to device-related infection. Multivariable expenditure models were conducted separately for patients in initial and replacement groups, controlling for demographics, comorbidities, and clinical characteristics.The study included 6615 patients. Multivariable expenditure models revealed that patients with infection have higher annual expenditures than patients without infection. Estimated incremental annual healthcare expenditures for patients with an infection were $59,716 (95% CI: $48,965-$69,480) for initial implanted patients and $64,833 (95% CI: $37,377-$86,519) for replacement patients. Only 26% of patients who were explanted for infection underwent a reimplant.These results show the substantial expenditure burden associated with an SCS-related infection. Management of SCS-related infection is important from both clinical and economic standpoints. The economic and clinical data presented here reinforce the need for additional research and strategies for healthcare providers to minimize SCS infections. Future economic research is needed to further define the specific economic cost drivers associated with the extensive expenditure burden.
| Reference Key |
provenzano2019spinalneuromodulation
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
|---|---|
| Authors | Provenzano, David A;Falowski, Steven M;Xia, Ying;Doth, Alissa H; |
| Journal | Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society |
| Year | 2019 |
| DOI |
10.1111/ner.12939
|
| URL | |
| Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.