A, B, or C? A Quasi-experimental Multi-site Study Investigating Three Option Multiple Choice Questions.
Clicks: 222
ID: 71829
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Improving Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
63.3
/100
222 views
178 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
There is nearly a century of educational research that has demonstrated that three option multiple-choice questions (MCQs) are as valid and reliable as four or five option, yet this format continues to be underutilized in educational institutions. This replication study was a quasi-experimental between groups research design conducted at three Canadian schools of nursing to examine the psychometric properties of three option MCQs when compared to the more traditional four option questions. Data analysis revealed that there were no statistically significant differences in the item discrimination, difficulty or mean examination scores when MCQs were administered with three versus four option answer choices.Reference Key |
hartiganrogers2019ainternational
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
---|---|
Authors | Hartigan-Rogers, Jackie A;Redmond, Sandra;Cobbett, Shelley;Cifuentes, Karlene;Honan, Deena;Richard, Elizabeth;Sheane, Vanessa;VanTassell, Tamara; |
Journal | international journal of nursing education scholarship |
Year | 2019 |
DOI | 10.1515/ijnes-2019-0061 |
URL | |
Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.