Nano letters | Journament

Journal Ranking

#93 / 33,622
πŸ“Š Below Average
Overall Score
47.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
82
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
55
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 month ago

Nano letters

Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • βœ… Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • βœ… Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • βœ… No iframe limitations
  • βœ… Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • βœ… Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • βœ… Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name Nano Lett
Abbreviated Name nano lett
ISSN 1530-6992
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (275 total)

2009
Epitaxially driven formation of intricate supported gold nanostructures on a lattice-matched oxide substrate.
Devenyi, Gabriel A;Li, Jianfeng;Hughes, Robert A;Shi, An-Chang;Mascher, Peter;Preston, John S;
Vol. 9 , No. 12 , pp. 4258-63
428 views DOI Abstract
2019
Solving the Thermoelectric Trade-Off Problem with Metallic Carbon Nanotubes.
Ichinose, Yota;Yoshida, Akari;Horiuchi, Kanako;Fukuhara, Kengo;Komatsu, Natsumi;Gao, Weilu;Yomogida, Yohei;Matsubara, Manaho;Yamamoto, Takahiro;Kono, Junichiro;Yanagi, Kazuhiro;
402 views DOI Abstract
2016
Single-Nanowire Electrochemical Probe Detection for Internally Optimized Mechanism of Porous Graphene in Electrochemical Devices.
Hu, Ping;Yan, Mengyu;Wang, Xuanpeng;Han, Chunhua;He, Liang;Wei, Xiujuan;Niu, Chaojiang;Zhao, Kangning;Tian, Xiaocong;Wei, Qiulong;Li, Zijia;Mai, Liqiang;
Vol. 16 , No. 3 , pp. 1523-9
345 views DOI Abstract
2013
Size-dependent photoionization in single CdSe/ZnS nanocrystals.
Early, Kevin T;Nesbitt, David J;
Vol. 13 , No. 10 , pp. 4844-9
337 views DOI Abstract
2003
Langmuir- Blodgett silver nanowire monolayers for molecular sensing using surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy
Tao, Andrea;Kim, Franklin;Hess, Christian;Goldberger, Joshua;He, Rongrui;Sun, Yugang;Xia, Younan;Yang, Peidong
Vol. 3 , No. 9 , pp. 1229-1233
336 views
2019
Mechanostability of the Fibrinogen Bridge between Staphylococcal Surface Protein ClfA and Endothelial Cell Integrin Ξ±Ξ².
Viela, Felipe;Speziale, Pietro;Pietrocola, Giampiero;DufrΓͺne, Yves F;
326 views DOI Abstract
2019
Massive Vacancy Concentration Yields Strong Room-Temperature Ferromagnetism in Two-Dimensional ZnO.
Yin, Xin;Wang, Yizhan;Jacobs, Ryan;Shi, Yeqi;Szlufarska, Izabela;Morgan, Dane;Wang, Xudong;
324 views DOI Abstract
2019
Hydrogel Gate Graphene Field-Effect Transistors as Multiplexed Biosensors.
Bay, Hamed Hosseini;Vo, Richard;Dai, Xiaochuan;Hsu, Huan-Hsuan;Mo, Zhiming;Cao, Siran;Li, Wenyi;Omenetto, Fiorenzo G;Jiang, Xiaocheng;
Vol. 19 , No. 4 , pp. 2620-2626
322 views DOI Abstract
2019
Silicon-Core Carbon-Shell Nanoparticles for Lithium-ion Batteries: Rational Comparison Between Amorphous and Graphitic Carbon Coatings.
Nava, Giorgio;Schwan, Joseph;Boebinger, Matthew G;McDowell, Matthew T;Mangolini, Lorenzo;
315 views DOI Abstract
2009
The dependence of the plasmon field induced nonradiative electronic relaxation mechanisms on the gold shell thickness in vertically aligned CdTe-Au core-shell nanorods.
Neretina, Svetlana;Dreaden, Erik C;Qian, Wei;El-Sayed, Mostafa A;Hughes, Robert A;Preston, John S;Mascher, Peter;
Vol. 9 , No. 11 , pp. 3772-9
310 views DOI Abstract
View All 275 Articles
48
Overall
Below Average
82
15
30
40
55
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

47.8/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

82.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

55.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.