evolutionary applications | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2939 / 33,971
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
40.2/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

evolutionary applications

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name evol appl
Abbreviated Name evol appl
ISSN 1752-4571
Aim and Scope
URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/17524571
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (35 total)

2020
Genome-wide signatures of environmental adaptation in European aspen () under current and future climate conditions.
Ingvarsson, Pär K;Bernhardsson, Carolina;
Vol. 13 , No. 1 , pp. 132-142
500 views DOI Abstract
2020
Genomic assessment of local adaptation in dwarf birch to inform assisted gene flow.
Borrell, James S;Zohren, Jasmin;Nichols, Richard A;Buggs, Richard J A;
Vol. 13 , No. 1 , pp. 161-175
400 views DOI Abstract
2020
Forest genomics: Advancing climate adaptation, forest health, productivity, and conservation.
Isabel, Nathalie;Holliday, Jason A;Aitken, Sally N;
Vol. 13 , No. 1 , pp. 3-10
379 views DOI Abstract
2020
Going with the flow: Intraspecific variation may act as a natural ally to counterbalance the impacts of global change for the riparian species .
Godbout, Julie;Gros-Louis, Marie-Claude;Lamothe, Manuel;Isabel, Nathalie;
Vol. 13 , No. 1 , pp. 176-194
360 views DOI Abstract
2020
Multi-trait genomic selection for weevil resistance, growth, and wood quality in Norway spruce.
Lenz, Patrick R N;Nadeau, Simon;Mottet, Marie-Josée;Perron, Martin;Isabel, Nathalie;Beaulieu, Jean;Bousquet, Jean;
Vol. 13 , No. 1 , pp. 76-94
348 views DOI Abstract
2020
Evaluating genomic data for management of local adaptation in a changing climate: A lodgepole pine case study.
Mahony, Colin R;MacLachlan, Ian R;Lind, Brandon M;Yoder, Jeremy B;Wang, Tongli;Aitken, Sally N;
Vol. 13 , No. 1 , pp. 116-131
337 views DOI Abstract
2019
Preferential helping to relatives: A potential mechanism responsible for lower yield of crop variety mixtures?
Fréville, Hélène;Roumet, Pierre;Rode, Nicolas Olivier;Rocher, Aline;Latreille, Muriel;Muller, Marie-Hélène;David, Jacques;
Vol. 12 , No. 9 , pp. 1837-1849
335 views DOI Abstract
2020
Optimizing genomic selection for blight resistance in American chestnut backcross populations: A trade-off with American chestnut ancestry implies resistance is polygenic.
Westbrook, Jared W;Zhang, Qian;Mandal, Mihir K;Jenkins, Eric V;Barth, Laura E;Jenkins, Jerry W;Grimwood, Jane;Schmutz, Jeremy;Holliday, Jason A;
Vol. 13 , No. 1 , pp. 31-47
322 views DOI Abstract
2020
Tracing the footprints of a moving hybrid zone under a demographic history of speciation with gene flow.
Menon, Mitra;Landguth, Erin;Leal-Saenz, Alejandro;Bagley, Justin C;Schoettle, Anna W;Wehenkel, Christian;Flores-Renteria, Lluvia;Cushman, Samuel A;Waring, Kristen M;Eckert, Andrew J;
Vol. 13 , No. 1 , pp. 195-209
319 views DOI Abstract
2019
Tethered homing gene drives: A new design for spatially restricted population replacement and suppression.
Dhole, Sumit;Lloyd, Alun L;Gould, Fred;
Vol. 12 , No. 8 , pp. 1688-1702
297 views DOI Abstract
View All 35 Articles
40
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.2/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.