Process of Judging Significant Modifications for Different Transportation Systems compared to the Approach for Nuclear Installations

Clicks: 260
ID: 95851
2015
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality Improving Quality
0.0 /100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
The implementation of the CSM regulation by the European Commission in 2009 which harmonizes the risk assessment process and introduces a rather new concept of judging changes within the European railway industry. This circumstance has risen the question how other technology sectors handle the aspect of modifications and alterations. The paper discusses the approaches for judging the significance of modifications within the three transport sectors of European railways, aviation and maritime transportation and the procedure which is used in the area of nuclear safety. We will outline the similarities and differences between these four methods and discuss the underlying reasons. Finally, we will take into account the role of the European legislator and the fundamental idea of a harmonization of the different approaches.
Reference Key
petrek2015processtransnav Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Petrek, Nicolas;Berg, Heinz Peter;
Journal transnav: international journal on marine navigation and safety of sea transportation
Year 2015
DOI DOI not found
URL
http://www.transnav.eu/files/Process of Judging Significant Modifications for Different Transportation Systems compared to the Approach for Nuclear Installations,610.pdf
Keywords
Technology economics as a science transportation and communications naval architecture. shipbuilding. marine engineering canals and inland navigation. waterways

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

Comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.