Comparing Delivery Methods of an Introductory Nutrition Course Using the Community of Inquiry.
Clicks: 273
ID: 92183
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Improving Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
Popular Article
70.7
/100
273 views
218 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
To compare student perceptions and final grades of online vs face-to-face nutrition courses using the community of inquiry (COI) framework.Using a cross-sectional research design, students in 3 courses completed the 34-item COI questionnaire. One-way ANOVA compared the COI and final grades.One hundred eight students participated. There were no significant differences in the perception of teaching presence (F[2,103] = 0.214, P = .81), social presence (F[2,103] = 0.393, P = .68), cognitive presence (F[2,103] = 0.428, P = .65), and final grades (F[2,140] = 0.846, P =.43).Online courses may provide similar perceptions of connection to the course content, peers, and the instructor similar to face-to-face courses and may result in similar grades. Instructor professional development may be warranted to ensure the use of instructional strategies that enhance connections and facilitate higher-level learning. Additional research is needed to replicate these findings with multiple instructors and a larger sample size.Reference Key |
miller2019comparingjournal
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
---|---|
Authors | Miller, M Elizabeth;Newton, Kelsie;Stover, Sherry;Miller, Benjamin;Buttolph, Jenna; |
Journal | journal of nutrition education and behavior |
Year | 2019 |
DOI | S1499-4046(19)31014-0 |
URL | |
Keywords |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.