Inhalable dry powders of rifampicin highlighting potential and drawbacks in formulation development for experimental tuberculosis aerosol therapy.

Clicks: 245
ID: 91122
2020
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality Improving Quality
0.0 /100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
: Recently, tuberculosis was reported as the leading cause of death from a single infectious agent. Standard therapy includes administration of four first-line antibiotics, i.e. rifampicin, isoniazid, ethambutol, and pyrazinamide over a period of at least 26 weeks, which in case of rifampicin oftentimes is accompanied by unwanted side effects and variable bioavailability that compromise a positive therapeutic outcome. As the main site of infection is the lungs, it is desirable to develop a therapeutic formulation to be administered via the pulmonary route.: This work presents a literature review on studies investigating inhalable dry powder formulations including rifampicin in the context of an experimental tuberculosis therapy, with a special focus on aerosol performance.: It was found that formulation approaches involving different strategies and functional excipients are under investigation but as of now, no formulation has managed to leap into commercial clinical testing. Reasons for this might not primarily be associated with a lack of suitable candidates, but amongst others a lack of suitable models to assess the efficacy, therapeutic benefit, and cost-effectiveness of the candidate formulations.
Reference Key
berkenfeld2020inhalableexpert Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Berkenfeld, Kai;McConville, Jason T;Lamprecht, Alf;
Journal expert opinion on drug delivery
Year 2020
DOI 10.1080/17425247.2020.1720644
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.