Synergy effect of meropenem-based combinations against Acinetobacter baumannii: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Clicks: 213
ID: 8284
2018
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Improving Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
Emerging Content
76.5
/100
213 views
170 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
Synergy effect of meropenem-based combinations against Acinetobacter baumannii: a systematic review and meta-analysis Zhihui Jiang,1,2,* Xianxia He,3,* Jian Li2 1Institute of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Natural Products, College of Pharmacy, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China; 2Department of Pharmacy, Guangzhou General Hospital of Guangzhou Military Command, Guangzhou, China; 3Department of Drug Certification, Center for Certification and Evaluation, Guangzhou Food and Drug Administration, Guangzhou, China *These authors contributed equally to this work Purpose: The main objective of our meta-analysis was to examine the in vitro synergistic effect of meropenem-based combination therapies against Acinetobacter baumannii through a systematic review of the existing literature. Methods: An extensive search was performed with no restrictions on date of publication, language, and publication type. Our study evaluated the main conclusions drawn from various studies describing the synergistic activity of combination therapies in vitro. Results: In this review, 56 published studies were included. Our report included data on 20 types of antibiotics combined with meropenem in 1,228 Acinetobacter baumannii isolates. In time-kill studies, meropenem combined with polymyxin B and rifampicin showed synergy rates of 98.3% (95% CI, 83.7%–100.0%) and 89.4% (95% CI, 57.2%–100.0%), respectively, for Acinetobacter baumannii, modest synergy rates were found for meropenem combined with several antibiotics such as colistin and sulbactam, and no synergy effect was displayed in the combination of meropenem and ciprofloxacin, whereas in checkerboard method, the synergy rates of polymyxin B and rifampicin were 37.0% (95% CI, 0.00%–100.0%) and 56.3% (95% CI, 8.7%–97.8%), respectively. Conclusion: We found that time-kill studies generally identified the greatest synergy, while checkerboard and Etest methods yielded relatively poor synergy rates. Further well-designed in vivo studies should be carried out to confirm these findings. Keywords: Acinetobacter baumannii, meropenem, synergy, combination, in vitroReference Key |
jiang2018synergyinfection
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
---|---|
Authors | Zhihui Jiang;Xianxia He;Jian Li; |
Journal | Infection and drug resistance |
Year | 2018 |
DOI | 10.2147/IDR.S172137 |
URL | |
Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.