Pediatric Emergency Room Transfers: Are They Warranted?

Abstract

Emergency room transfers to a higher level of care are a vital component of modern health care, as optimal care of patients requires providing access to specialized personnel and facilities. However, literature has shown that orthopaedic transfers to a higher level of care facility are frequently unnecessary. The purpose of this study was to assess the appropriateness of pediatric orthopaedic transfers to a tertiary care center and the factors surrounding these transfers.All pediatric orthopaedic transfers to the pediatric emergency department (ED) were evaluated over a 4-year period. A retrospective chart review was performed to assess the factors surrounding the transfer including patient demographics, time of transfer, day of transfer, insurance status, outcome of transfer, and diagnosis. Three independent variables were utilized to assess the appropriateness of the transfer: the need for an operative procedure, the need for conscious sedation, and the need for a closed reduction in the ED.A total of 218 pediatric orthopaedic emergency room transfers were evaluated, of which 86% of them involved an acute fracture. Twenty-seven percent (59/218) of the transfers occurred on the weekend, with over half (61%) of these transfers being initiated between 6 PM and 6 AM. Approximately half (47%) of the transfers involved patients with Medicaid. Fifty-five percent (120/218) of cases required a procedure in the operating room and 22% (49/218) had a closed reduction performed in the ED. Conscious sedation was provided in the ED for 22% (48/218) of patients. Twenty-two percent (47/218) of transfers did not require a trip to the operating room, conscious sedation, nor a closed reduction procedure in the ED.The vast majority of pediatric orthopaedic transfers are warranted as they required operative intervention, a closed reduction maneuver, or conscious sedation in the ED.Level III-Therapeutic.