PROMIS physical health domain scores are related to cervical deformity severity.

Clicks: 169
ID: 79708
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality Improving Quality
0.0 /100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the association of available cervical alignment components through the Ames cervical deformity (CD) classification parameters with the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) physical health domain metrics.Surgical CD patients (C2-C7 Cobb >10° or C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis [cSVA] >4 cm or T1 slope minus cervical lordosis (TS-CL) >15°) ≥18 years with available baseline (BL) radiographic and PROMIS were isolated in a single-center spine database. Patients were classified according to the Ames CD modifiers for cSVA and TS-CL (low deformity [Low], moderate deformity [Mod], and severe deformity [Sev]). Descriptives and univariate analyses compared population-weighted PROMIS scores for Pain Intensity (PI), Physical Function (PF), and Pain Interference (Int) across CD modifiers. Conditional tree analysis with logistic regression sampling determined the threshold of PROMIS scores for which the correlation with Ames radiographic cutoffs was most significant. Reported cutoff values for Mod (cSVA: 4-8 cm; TS-CL: 15-20°) and Sev (cSVA: >8 cm; TS-CL: >20°) disabilities were used.Two hundred and eight patients (58.8 years, female: 51%, 29.6 kg/m, Charlson Comorbidity Index: 1.19). BL cSVA modifier by severity: 83.2% Low, 16.8% Mod. No patients met criteria for severe cSVA. BL TS-CL modifier by severity: 18.8% Low, 22.1% Mod, 59.1% Sev. Mean baseline PROMIS scores were as follows: PI score: 89.6 ± 15.4, PF score: 11.9 ± 13.1, Int score: 56.9 ± 6.8. PI did not differ between cSVA and TS-CL severity. Mod cSVA patients and Mod/Sev TS-CL modifier groups trended toward lower PF scores and higher Int scores. A PI score of >96 (odds ratio [OR]: 0.658 [0.303-1.430]), a PF score of <14 (OR: 1.864 [0.767-4.531]), and an Int score of > 57.4 (OR: 1.878 [0.889-3.967]) were predictors of Mod cSVA. A PI score of >87 (OR: 1.428 [0.767-2.659]), a PF score of <14 (OR: 1.551 [0.851-2.827]), and an Int score of >56.5 (OR: 1.689 [0.967-2.949]) were predictors of Sev TS-CL.PROMIS physical health domains were related to the Ames CD classification. Certain BL PROMIS thresholds can be connected to the severity of CD.
Reference Key
piercepromisjournal Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Pierce, Katherine E;Alas, Haddy;Brown, Avery E;Bortz, Cole A;O'Connell, Brooke;Vasquez-Montes, Dennis;Diebo, Bassel G;Lafage, Renaud;Lafage, Virginie;Buckland, Aaron J;Passias, Peter G;
Journal journal of craniovertebral junction & spine
Year Year not found
DOI 10.4103/jcvjs.JCVJS_52_19
URL
Keywords

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.