Antithrombotic Dilemmas after Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Watchman Device Placement
Clicks: 236
ID: 7908
2019
Article Quality & Performance Metrics
Overall Quality
Improving Quality
0.0
/100
Combines engagement data with AI-assessed academic quality
Reader Engagement
Steady Performance
64.8
/100
236 views
189 readers
Trending
AI Quality Assessment
Not analyzed
Abstract
Antithrombotic therapy for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) has dramatically shifted from warfarin, a vitamin K antagonist, to the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) such as dabigatran, apixaban, and rivaroxaban. In patients with contraindications to oral anticoagulation, left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) devices, such as the Watchman™ device, may be considered; however, temporary postimplantation antithrombotic therapy is still a recommended practice. We present a case of complex antithrombotic management, post LAAO device implantation, designed to avoid drug interactions with concomitant rifampin use and remained necessary secondary to subsequent device leak. This case highlights the challenges of antithrombotic therapy post LAAO device placement in a complex, but representative, patient.Reference Key |
tania2019antithromboticcase
Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using
SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
|
---|---|
Authors | Ahuja, Tania;Murphy, Scarlett;Sartori, Daniel J.;Ahuja, Tania;Murphy, Scarlett;Sartori, Daniel J.; |
Journal | case reports in cardiology |
Year | 2019 |
DOI | 10.1155/2019/5247105 |
URL | |
Keywords | Keywords not found |
Citations
No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.