Antithrombotic Dilemmas after Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Watchman Device Placement

Clicks: 227
ID: 7908
2019
Antithrombotic therapy for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) has dramatically shifted from warfarin, a vitamin K antagonist, to the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) such as dabigatran, apixaban, and rivaroxaban. In patients with contraindications to oral anticoagulation, left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) devices, such as the Watchman™ device, may be considered; however, temporary postimplantation antithrombotic therapy is still a recommended practice. We present a case of complex antithrombotic management, post LAAO device implantation, designed to avoid drug interactions with concomitant rifampin use and remained necessary secondary to subsequent device leak. This case highlights the challenges of antithrombotic therapy post LAAO device placement in a complex, but representative, patient.
Reference Key
tania2019antithromboticcase Use this key to autocite in the manuscript while using SciMatic Manuscript Manager or Thesis Manager
Authors Ahuja, Tania;Murphy, Scarlett;Sartori, Daniel J.;Ahuja, Tania;Murphy, Scarlett;Sartori, Daniel J.;
Journal case reports in cardiology
Year 2019
DOI 10.1155/2019/5247105
URL
Keywords Keywords not found

Citations

No citations found. To add a citation, contact the admin at info@scimatic.org

No comments yet. Be the first to comment on this article.